Results of health surveys of two species of farmed tuna: southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) in Australia and northern bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) in the Mediterranean

نویسندگان

  • B. Nowak
  • I. Mladineo
  • H. Aiken
  • N. Bott
  • C. Hayward
چکیده

Health of two farmed species of tuna was evaluated in farm surveys in Australia, Croatia and Spain. The results were discussed at tuna health workshop during EAFP 12th International Conference. While a wide range of parasites was found, few problems occurred during the surveys. The information obtained will be useful for future monitoring and research on health of farmed tuna. Introduction Fisheries of two major species of tuna: Northern Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) and Southern Bluefin Tuna (T. maccoyii) are based mostly on grow-out of the wild fish in cages in the sea for about 6-12 months. This process was initiated by introduction of quotas and the potential to gain a higher return from farmed fish (because of their increased weight and enhanced condition). In the Mediterranean region, there are two types of tuna farming depending mainly on the catch size of bluefin tuna. The well-known tuna fattening process is based on the catch of adult and large specimens over 80 kg that will be fattened for 6-10 months; the second type of tuna farming involves the catch of small tuna up to 15 kg, and lasts 1.5-2.5 years, these fish are reared up to 80 kg and fed on imported frozen baitfish and to a lesser extent on local baitfish. The former type of tuna farming is employed by most Mediterranean countries involved in tuna commercial or experimental farming Spain, Portugal, Malta, Italy, Turkey, Cyprus, Morocco, Tunis and Libya. The latter procedure is found only in Croatia and one Italian farm, as only very small tuna are caught in the Adriatic Sea. In Australia, Southern Bluefin Tuna are fattened for 3-9 months on frozen baitfish. While information on tuna diseases has been reviewed (Munday et al 2003), little information is available in the literature on the current health status of farmed tunas. The aim of this paper is to summarise results of recent health surveys carried out on farmed tuna. * Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 26(1) 2006, 39 Materials and methods Health surveys were undertaken in the Mediterranean and Australia. Prevalence was determined as the percentage of fish infected and abundance as number of parasites per fish (all fish, including uninfected fish). NBT in Croatia The survey of Croatian bluefin tuna health started in December 2002 and it has been limited to sampling during the transfer of the fish to their cages, the harvest period and occasional outbreaks of mortalities, which usually have a seasonal character. One farm in the central Adriatic and three farms in northern Adriatic were sampled. During the harvest and transfer visceral organs, kidney and gills were sampled. Brain examination and screening for Uronema sp. were included only in the mortalities investigation. Organs were examined fresh. The sampling took place each year during the harvest period (December February), during the mortalities (April July) and when fish were transferred to the cages (June August). The size of fish depended on the sampling time at transfer they were, usually from 7 to 15 kg, at harvest 30 to 80 kg and during mortalities from 15 to 35 kg. NBT in Spain Hearts, livers, kidneys, and gills of 26 farmed northern bluefin tuna were examined for the presence of Cardicola forsteri adults and eggs as well as for any other parasites. The fish were from an experimental farm, 62 to 118 kg weight, and were sampled in 2004. SBT in Australia The tuna health survey started in 2003 (Deveney et al., 2005). As parasites were identified as the main health risk for SBT (Nowak, 2004), the survey has focused on parasite loads in harvest fish and mortalities. Commercial and experimental samples are included in the survey. So far 1543 harvest fish and 85 mortalities have been examined. Routine examination covers gill parasites, screening for Cardicola forsteri and in most fish examination of internal organs (except kidney) for parasites. Targeted screening for Uronema nigricans or Caligus elongatus has been undertaken when these parasites were suspected to be an issue. This survey has not included examination of intestinal lumen and mucosa. Only a few gall bladders and bile samples were checked for coelozoic myxozoans. Other aspects of tuna health, such as histopathology, microbiology and immune response are addressed by preliminary studies. Results and discussion A range of parasites was found in cultured tuna during health surveys (Table 1). Some appeared to be unique to region or species, for example the ciliate Uronema nigricans, the cause of swimmer syndrome, was reported only from Australia. However, several parasites, of at least the same genus if not species, were present in both tuna species: from the Mediterranean and Australia. These included Hexostoma sp., Cardicola forsteri and Pseudocycnus appendiculatus (Table 1). In Australia most parasites were present on tuna each year, although the prevalence and intensity of infection differed, particularly for the copepod Caligus elongatus and ciliate Uronema nigricans. In Croatian tuna farming there was considerable annual variation in Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 26(1) 2006, 40 parasite presence and abundance. Once the fish were adapted to cages, their parasite fauna declined both in prevalence and abundance. For example, in Croatia some 50% of young tuna regularly host the nematode Oncophora melanocephala, attached deeply in pyloric caeca mucosa. However, their abundance was only 1.74 parasites/fish and soon after transfer to the cages, the parasite was lost from the tuna population and thus is not regarded as a serious threat to the health of farmed tuna. In Croatian tuna rearing there were no mortalities induced or even exacerbated by parasites. In Australia, Uronema nigricans infections were in the past linked to mortalities (Munday et al., 2000, Munday et al., 2003), however, improvements in husbandry and improved location of sites seemed to have eliminated this problem (Nowak, 2004). Hexostoma thynni was present in Southern Bluefin Tuna every year; in Croatia this parasite was found only in summer 2005 with 13% prevalence and abundance 0.2. In contrast to Hexostoma in Southern Bluefin Tuna, where noticeable gross swelling at the site of attachment is observed (Hayward et al., 2006), no pathological changes were noticed at the site of attachment of the monogenean, possibly due to the small size of the parasite. Table 1. Parasites detected in the surveys of two cultured species of tuna: Southern Bluefin Tuna in Australia (Deveney et al., 2005, Hayward et al., submitted, Hayward, unpublished), and Northern Bluefin Tuna in Spain (Aiken unpublished) and Croatia (Mladineo, unpublished, Mladineo and Tudor, 2004, Mladineo, 2005). s e t i s a r a P a n u T n i f e u l B n r e h t u o S n i f e u l B n r e h t r o N ) n i a p S ( a n u T n i f e u l B n r e h t r o N ) a i t a o r C ( a n u T s e t a i l i C s n a c i r g i n a m e n o r U d e n i m a x e t o N d n u o f t o N a i d i r o p s o r c i M d n u o f t o N d e n i m a x e t o N d e i f i t n e d i n U s n a o z o x y M a o d u K . p s d e n i m a x e t o N e a d i x y m o t a r e C s n a e n e g o n o M a l a s p a C i n n y h t a m o t s o x e H . p s . p s a m o t s o x e H s i v e a l a l l e m o t s i r T s n a e n e g i D i r e t s r o f a l o c i d r a C s d i o z o m y d i d d e i f i t n e d i n U i r e t s r o f a l o c i d r a C l l i g d e i f i t n e d i n U d i o z o m y d i d s e i c e p s 6 s d i o z o m y d i D : g n i d u l c n i i l d e w s i t s y c o m y d i D s i l a n i t s e t n i s e d i o i r e k i l l e o K s u c i r t s a g o n r e t n i . K a d o t a m e N d e i f i t n e d i n U d e n i m a x e t o N e m a r o h p o c n O a l a h p e c o n a l s i k a s i n A e a v r a l . p s a d o t s e C s i l i c a r g s u h c n y h r a r t e t i l l a C m u c a p s i d m u i r h t o b o t O d e n i m a x e t o N i r u i h c i r t n o l y x o t a p e H s d i o c r e c o r e l p y l b a m u s e r p f o s t s y c o t s a l B s u t a e n i l s u h c n y h r a r t e t u E a l a h p e c o h t n a c A s i t s i r p s u h c n y h r o n i d a h R n a l a h p e c o h t n a c a d e i f i t n e d i n U d e n i m a x e t o N d n u o f t o N a d o p e p o C s u t a g n o l e s u g i l a C s u t a l u c i d n e p p a s u n c y c o d u e s P s u r e t p y h c a r b s u r o h p y r u E i n n y h t a l l e i h c a r B s u n c y c o d u e s P s u t a l u c i d n e p p a a s o l i f a l l e n n e P Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 26(1) 2006, 41 In Croatia pasteurellosis caused by Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida had a seasonal occurrence, peaking usually in June and deteriorating slowly in 3-5 months (Mladineo et al., 2005). It was diagnosed twice during this study. Fish displayed no external clinical signs of disease except for changed coloration and atypical swimming, and gross pathology was limited to general signs of septicemia. Most fish died in 1-2 days without gross pathology, possibly due to the virulence of the bacterial strain or reduced resistance of the fish. A low percentage of fish developed a chronic form of infection with disseminated granulomas in kidney, also showing no gross pathology. Presence of tuna parasites was evaluated and did not appear to affect the development and the course of the disease (Mladineo et al., 2006). It is suspected that other risk factors included poor diet (including long storage), sudden rise of water temperature, lack of current and forest fires contributed to the outbreak. No viral diseases have been detected in tuna culture in Croatia, where molecular and histological screening for nodavirus infection was undertaken in the early stages of pasteurellosis. Viral pathogens were not covered by the survey in Spain nor of Southern Bluefin Tuna in Australia. Conclusions We have significantly increased our knowledge of farmed tuna health. This information is very useful as a baseline for further monitoring and research on health of farmed tuna. A wide range of parasites has been described from farmed tuna. At least some of them were present both in Mediterranean and Australia. No significant health problems were detected in tuna sampled during these surveys. International scientific collaboration has been beneficial to the progress of our research, particularly in the area of taxonomy of parasites. AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank Drs. Juan AntonioRaga and Francisco E. Montero, from theUniversity of Valencia, and Dr. AntonioGarcia, from the Spanish Institute ofOceanography for making samples fromSpain available for our research. The workdone by BN, HA, NB and CH formed part ofa project of Aquafin CRC, and received fundsfrom Australian’s Government CRC Program,Fisheries Research and DevelopmentCorporation and other CRC participants. ReferencesDeveney MR, Bayly TJ, Johnston CJ andNowak BF (2005). A parasite survey of farmedSouthern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyiiCastelnau). Journal of Fish Diseases 28, 279-284. Hayward CJ, Bott NJ and Nowak BF (2006).Hexostoma thynni (Delaroche 1811) Rafinesque1815 (Monogenea, Polyopisthocotylea)identified from gills of southern bluefin tuna,Thunnus maccoyii (Castelnau) farmed inAustralia. Journal of Fish Diseases, submitted. Mladineo I and Tudor M (2004). Digenea ofAdriatic cage-reared bluefin tuna Thunnusthynnus thynnus. Bulletin of the EuropeanAssociation of Fish Pathologists 24(3), 144-153. Mladineo I (2006). Histopathology of fivespecies of Didymocystis spp. (Digenea:Didymozoidae) in cage reared bluefin tuna(Thunnus thynnus thynnus). Veterinary ResearchCommunications in press. Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 26(1) 2006, 42 Mladineo I, Miletiæ I and Boèina I (2006).Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicidaoutbreak in cage-reared Atlantic bluefin tuna(Thunnus thynnus). Journal of Aquatic AnimalHealth in press. Munday BL, O’Donoghue PJ, Watts M, RoughK and Hawkesford T (1997). Fatal ence-phalitis due to the scuticociliate Uronemanigricans (Mueller) in sea-caged, southernbluefin tuna, Thunnus maccoyii (Castelnau).Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 30, 17–25.Munday BL, Sawada Y, Cribb T and HaywardCJ (2003). Diseases of tunas, Thunnus spp.Journal of Fish Diseases 26, 187-206. Nowak BF (2004). Assessment of health risksto southern bluefin tuna under current cultureconditions. Bulletin of European Association ofFish Pathologists 24, 45-51.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Ecosystem effects of bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus thynnus aquaculture in the NW Mediterranean Sea

In recent decades the eastern stock of Atlantic bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus thynnus has declined, driven by excessive catches partially mediated by the growth of the capturebased aquaculture of bluefin in the Mediterranean. This study addresses the potential direct and indirect food-web effects on trophic linkages in the ecosystem through the removal of both small pelagic fish species and wild...

متن کامل

Tuna nutrition and feeds : current status and future perspectives

Aquaculture is providing an ever-increasing proportion of fish in the human food basket prompting a search for new species to expand the range available to consumers. Large tunids/scombrids have long-since been a very valuable resource providing not only high quality protein, but also a rich source of the highly beneficial omega-3 (or n-3) long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids including eicosa...

متن کامل

Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) Diet in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and on the Eastern Scotian Shelf

The stomach contents of 68 Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) landed in Port Hood and Canso, Nova Scotia, in 2010, were analyzed to characterize the diet of bluefin tuna at the two locations. Of the sampled fish, 54 stomachs had contents. Pelagic schooling fish such as herring (Clupea harengus) and mackerel (Scomber scombrus) dominated the diets in both regions. However, a number of rare s...

متن کامل

DNA barcodes reveal species-specific mercury levels in tuna sushi that pose a health risk to consumers

Excessive ingestion of mercury--a health hazard associated with consuming predatory fishes--damages neurological, sensory-motor and cardiovascular functioning. The mercury levels found in Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) and bluefin tuna species (Thunnus maccoyii, Thunnus orientalis, and Thunnus thynnus), exceed or approach levels permissible by Canada, the European Union, Japan, the US, and the Wo...

متن کامل

Correction: Trophic Ecology of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (Thunnusthynnus) Larvae from the Gulf of Mexico and NW Mediterranean Spawning Grounds: A Comparative Stable Isotope Study

The species Thunnus thynnus is misspelled in the article title. The correct title is: Trophic Ecology of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) Larvae from the Gulf of Mexico and NW Mediterranean Spawning Grounds: A Comparative Stable Isotope Study. The correct citation is: Laiz-Carrión R, Gerard T, Uriarte A, Malca E, Quintanilla JM, Muhling BA, et al. (2015) Trophic Ecology of Atlantic Bluef...

متن کامل

The Real maccoyii: Identifying Tuna Sushi with DNA Barcodes – Contrasting Characteristic Attributes and Genetic Distances

BACKGROUND The use of DNA barcodes for the identification of described species is one of the least controversial and most promising applications of barcoding. There is no consensus, however, as to what constitutes an appropriate identification standard and most barcoding efforts simply attempt to pair a query sequence with reference sequences and deem identification successful if it falls withi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006